26-1102 · Bar-K Ranch — 640 ac, Chaffee County, Colorado

Rural Land & Ranch 1.1.0 Colorado 0.9.0 In progress

Client High Country Bank, Salida COIntended use FinancingInterest Fee simpleEffective Aug 20, 2026Appraiser Dana WhitfieldReviewer Sam Ortiz

PROOF-02 · nationwide by design, proven with one non-Texas binding. The same firm, the same type pack, the same five-stage workspace — with the Texas jurisdiction stack swapped for Colorado. Everything that differs below is pack data: fields, disclosures, coverage, and credential language. Nothing below required a new screen, route, or code path.

The binding — one line changes

＋ New appraisal dialog, as on Appraisals

Type packRural Land & Ranch 1.1.0 — identical to 26-1041 Krauss Ranch Add-on packs— none Jurisdiction stack1 · colorado 0.9.0 (ordered · pinned — replaces tx-core; jurisdiction is data, not code) Connectorsacs-demographics — nationwide by source, nothing to change

The binding dialog is the entire “go national” action: pick a different jurisdiction pack. The rail, database, Studio, versions, and delivery lineage are jurisdiction-blind.

Coverage honesty — Explorer over Chaffee County

layers appear only where coverage is live

Parcels — Chaffee County GIS v2026.1

county-level coverage · statewide CO bake not yet run — the layer says so instead of drawing an empty map

Firm comps

Ring 1 — same verified database; 61 CO records

FEMA flood — NFHL

live nationwide · eff. 2025-11-04

Soils — SSURGO

live nationwide

Water rights — CO DWR decreed rights

jurisdiction-pack layer JURISDICTION · planned with colorado 1.0

Owner namesVisible — Colorado open records

“Owner suppressed (§25.025)” never appears here — suppression is a Texas jurisdiction rule applied by the tx-core pack, not product behavior. Each state’s disclosure rules ride in its pack.

Per-parcel source stamps work unchanged: TAX_YEAR 2025 · Chaffee County GIS · DATE_ACQ 2026-05-02

What the Colorado pack adds & discloses

JURISDICTION

Subject-stage fields

Water rights2.4 cfs decreed — Cottonwood Creek, priority 1912 Augmentation planNone of record Conservation easementNone of record

Decreed water rights are a structured, provenance-stamped fact group the pack adds to the same Land & site facts section — the Texas job never sees these fields.

Report-stage disclosures

The pack contributes a Water rights & ditch company narrative region and swaps the certification’s licensing paragraph for Colorado language (right). The report shell, exhibits, versions, and outputs are untouched.

Credential & certification

SignerDana Whitfield Colorado credentialDORA CG.2002417 · Certified General (by reciprocity) SnapshotTaken at delivery — same mechanics as Texas

People can hold credentials in several states; the job binds to the one matching its jurisdiction, and delivery snapshots that credential.

…I certify that this appraisal was prepared in conformity with USPAP and the rules of the Colorado Board of Real Estate Appraisers; that I hold Colorado Certified General credential CG.2002417, in good standing as of the date of this report…

highlighted text = merged from the jurisdiction pack + credential record — never typed

Everything else — unchanged, on purpose

Overview → Subject → Comparables → Analysis → Report run exactly as in 26-1041: the same editable Report Studio, in-document suggestion review, named versions with exact capture, and Word / PDF / print / deliver lineage.

The proof: the national claim costs one jurisdiction pack per state — coverage honesty, disclosure rules, and certification language ride as data through an architecture that never asked which state it was in.

Groundsworth · prototype v2.1 · proof walkthrough (PROOF-02, gap analysis 2026-07-24) · prototype guide & site map